English
简体中文
Publisher (Deep Silver) and the developer (4A Games) finally decided on the release date Metro: Last Light on Mac – the owners of Macintosh will drive happiness on September 10. The version of the game for Linux will also be and will be released at the end of the year. Developers decided not to trust the porting to all sakes and carry it out on their own.
Metro: Last Light For the above platforms, Steam Play will support, and also receive the same loaded content as the versions for PC and consoles.
In addition, in a separate interview with Joystiq, General Director Deep Silver He said that the brand Metro has become a very valuable acquisition for the company, and the series will certainly continue.
August 28, 2013 Electronic Arts attitude to offline the players understood viciously
August 28, 2013 PlayStation 4 will be disclosed in the fourth year of her life
Metro: Last Light
The best comments
But in the second this voice is more suitable for a 25-30 year old guy than the bass of the 45 year old man in the first part
Well, this did not interfere with Freeman, and Artyom in 1 part during the fall from the trolley still said 1 word -fuck 1
The Director General of Deep Silver said Casino-And-Friend.uk the Metro brand has become a very valuable purchase for the company, and the series will certainly continue.
The main thing is that in the third part of Artem (well, or what kind of gg will be there) healing from the non -metabolic. Otherwise it’s too difficult to develop an adequate plot with such a protagonist.
And 4A Games, it seems that now they wanted some other project, so that the series will have to rest from the series in any case.
And on the opening video it is clear that he prints this story on a typewriter (the same machine is present in the main menu)
Yeah. Artem, in the first part, says Hunter’s voice. It is not felt that formal idiocy is felt here.
GIMP can do all this well (you opened it at least once?)
Analogs of programs. For example, Sound Forge – Audacy
The continuation is good ^^ The main thing is that they do not put on the conveyor only)) the series is where to grow and develop and while it is still interesting and not tired.
I put it on the windowsill during a five -minute change at the university. And, it is worth noting that at the output the system is ready to work, with faderfox, sane by a video player, office, PDF and dejavu Rider ..
It’s not worth forgetting about Wine, though I got a crookedly the office under it, but then my curvature affects
Linux is full of specialized software, which, however, is useless for an ordinary user. Linux does not promise money as a home system
So the opposite situation, the highly specialized programs that are needed for work are not there, there is no photoshop, there are still heaps of programs whose names I am too lazy to list. But why should an ordinary user keep photoshop on a computer to cut pictures, GIMP copes well with this need. An ordinary user does not need to type formulas in the documents (it seems to be many times more convenient, although there are those on both platforms), and work with the text is almost similar (except that the Office of the Office is more trust than the document than the DOD). Well, a program for calculating the proof profile in the crystal, an ordinary user is not needed for exactly. Games begin to move slowly. Come on, tell me what else you need to use a computer at home
If you take Ubuntu as a basis, it has one ultimatic argument: it is free. It comes out of the box with free drivers, thanks to which almost any equipment starts with half a pike. She has no innate immunodeficiency. Ubuntu gland requirements have grown, but there are a bunch of fully compatible editions with various DEs, in which the requirements can be even lower than the XP. Again, there are a bunch of users who need only the Internet and music. Why do they pay for what they can get free?
And sit most of the time under the virtualbox, in Linux itself, leaving only to wipe the Internet and listen to music. The same thing is done on the Windows.
To put it mildly, this statement does not really agree with my experience. What exactly does Winda give you, what is not in Linux?
But I advise you to climb, the Ubuntu is easier to put than Windows, and the problems are often solved by thoughtless copying of console teams from thematic forums to the terminal, there are no registry, important folders are reliably protected by the user’s hands. How to put it next to Venda can be read in ubuntology, and if scary, there is also an instructions for installing a boxing virtual